Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:04:37PM +0900, Horms wrote: > > I am pretty dubious about the possibility of this actually manifesting > > breakage. And I am even more dubious about adding this if > > the same isn't being done upstream. Can we close this for now? > > mips upstream uses this always, s390 likes to include libgcc and have > therefor to use this flag. Actually mips upstream does _not_ use it always, because it might break gcc 2.95. It is, however, the right thing to do for newer compilers. Thiemo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature