Bug#277736: [cchan@outblaze.com: Re: linux 2.6.9 still having network code problems]
This thread seems relevant.
Reference: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=109953032629224&w=2
----- Forwarded message from Christopher Chan <cchan@outblaze.com> -----
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 09:08:28 +0800
From: Christopher Chan <cchan@outblaze.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Cc: Christopher Chan <cchan@outblaze.com>, ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com
Subject: Re: linux 2.6.9 still having network code problems
Christopher Chan wrote:
>
>>>Previously with 2.6.7 I had to use this values in sysctl to be able
>>>to continue to access the box:
>>>
>>>net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 2048
>>>net.ipv4.route.gc_thresh = 65536
>>>net.ipv4.route.max_size = 1048576
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 21861
>>>(smtpd).
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>>>failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 1E619F78 seq 1E61A378
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>>>failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 1E619F78 seq 1E61A378
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
>>>tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed at
>>>net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>>>failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 1E619F78 seq 1E61A378
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
>>>tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed at
>>>net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK)
>>>failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied 1E619F78 seq 1E61A378
>>>Nov 1 03:16:00 spf5-3 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
>>>tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed at
>>>net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
>>
>>
>>
>>This is a networking bug.
>>
>
>Yes...it's the same one that won't allow me to use the e100 driver with
>NAPI enabled with or without them sysctl tweaks and the same one that
>forces me to use the tweaks without NAPI enabled for the e100 driver.
>
>With NAPI enabled, I see the problem when under pressure.
>
>FYI, the 2.6.9 kernel is running with NAPI enabled.
>
2.6.9 kernel with NAPI enabled and sysctl tweaks listed at the top of
mail still triggers network code problems:
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:46:45 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (tp->copied_seq ==
tp->rcv_nxt || (flags & (MSG_PEEK | MSG_TRUNC))) failed a
t net/ipv4/tcp.c (1348)
Nov 3 10:47:56 spf0 kernel: kb)->end_seq)) failed at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1061)
Nov 3 10:47:56 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:47:56 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!skb ||
before(tp->copied_seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) failed at net/ipv
4/tcp.c (1061)
......................................
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 156 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (!skb ||
before(tp->copied_seq, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq)) failed at net/ipv
4/tcp.c (1061)
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 106 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 121 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 222 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 151 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags & MSG_PEEK) failed
at net/ipv4/tcp.c (1284)
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: recvmsg bug: copied D51512C9 seq D51512FA
Nov 3 10:47:59 spf0 kernel: printk: 163 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 10:48:04 spf0 kernel: printk: 216 messages suppressed.
apparent recovery...
Nov 3 11:15:44 spf0 kernel: printk: 15 messages suppressed.
Nov 3 11:23:42 spf0 kernel: printk: 61 messages suppressed.
Box is gone...
Please continue to keep available the NAPI disable/enable option in the
e100 driver.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Horms
Reply to: