[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kmail (Was: trixie upgrade issues)



Hey,

> > > > 4) In kmail some folders are missing for an imap account (with
> > > > many
> > > > folders). On the imap server, the all mail folders are present.
> > > 
> > > This probably needs some more troubleshooting, and perhaps a bug
> > > report.
> > 
> > I am happy to open a bug report, do you have a suggestion what
> > debugging information should be included?
> 
> I would recommend opening the bug against Kmail with all the
> information you have.  Hopefully someone has some idea of the root
> cause or some procedure for sussing out further information.  The bug
> can be reassigned to a different package (like akonadi or dovecot) if
> it ends up not being Kmails’ problem.

I face the same issue like rainer that some folders are not showing up in 
KMail but all are visible in akonadiconsole. Very visible it is for my 
ionos.de address , where my INBOX is affeced. But also for my dovecot handled 
address.

my workaraound is to reset the content types in the properties of the folders 
via akonadiconsole (right click on the folder select "Folder Properties". For 
me the "content types" is empty than the folder is invisible. So I add 
"message/rfc822" to the content types close the dialog via Ok. Reopen it and 
add "inode/directory" close again and voila the folder is visible and useable 
in kmail.

The strange thing on database level it has both mimetypes already attached. 
Removing and readding the mimetpyes triggers something that fixes the invisible 
state of the folder. 

And this workaround only works till you restart akonadi.

Regards,

hefee

-- 
Mein öffentlicher Schlüssel / My public key: 0x19221BC085BE851F
Fingerabdruck / Fingerprint:
EF09 31C4 ACED 4606 C314 0E7C 1922 1BC0 85BE 851F
runterladen/download:
https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/
EF0931C4ACED4606C3140E7C19221BC085BE851F

PNG image

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: