Hey, > So doing asynchronous operations at the same time is supposed to be safe. > FWIW I don't know anything about the code you're referring to, but perhaps > it's no longer coordinating use of the synchronous functions, or it's just > uncovered a GPGME bug. Sorry, I have too may hats here to as I also be part of upstream. When I was moving the code to an asynchronous code in March the tests were run successfully. Than I saw in August that the tests are failing with no further changes on kdepim side. So it is properly a gpg issue. But nobody told me that there is also a real bug, so I thought, it is only a test issue, that I can ignore, that's why I haven't rushed to get the patch merged: https://invent.kde.org/pim/messagelib/-/merge_requests/14 hefee
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.