Re: KDEPIM transition to 16.04 is ok ?
I'm currently on my perfectly working kdepim 16.04 environment.
My upgrade wasn't peaceful as expected. Maybe i wasn't sufficiently patient to let akonadi do the migration and i finished by starting from scratch.
Feedback from my upgrade :
- The upgrade of packages was fine
- At first, kmail wasn't working claiming that he wasn't able to fetch some ressources. I removed loal folder resource with akonadi-console and i was able to start kmail
- None of my resource was working correctly
- I removed all my resources (i'm using imap for mail and dav for addressbook and calendars ...), by a hard reset of akonadi (https://docs.kde.org/trunk5/en/kdepim/kmail/clean-start-after-a-failed-migration.html)
- I created all y resources again
And now i'm a very happy user of kdepim 16.04 ^^
Le samedi 9 juillet 2016, 11:29:38 CEST Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> Am Samstag, 9. Juli 2016, 09:41:19 CEST schrieb Gael:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think that the output of my apt is ok.
> > Do we need to wait for a specific package/version or is it ok to upgrade ?
> >
> > # LANG=C apt dist-upgrade -s
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > Building dependency tree
> > Reading state information... Done
> > Calculating upgrade... Done
> > The following packages will be REMOVED:
> > kdepim-kresources libeventviews4 libkolab0v5 libksieveui4 libmessagelist4
>
> As kdepim-kresources is 4.14 and akonadi-server als well as kdepim-runtime is
> upgraded I think this is okay.
>
> For search you may also want to install libkf5akonadisearch-plugins as its not
> automatically selected, currently, it seems. But you can do this after running
> the upgrade command.
>
> Make a backup of your data before upgrading and letting the migrating run.
> Also log out of your desktop, make sure that old Akonadi is not running
> anymore, and then log in again (or just reboot), after the upgrade.
>
> > I'm so glad kdepim 16.04 is coming to unstable, thanks and kudos to the
> > whole Debian KDE team !
>
> I think it is a *huge* improvement.
>
> Thanks,
>
--
Gael
Reply to: