[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE Plasma 5.6 in Debian unstable / testing?



HI Hillel,

I am not involved in packaging, but I see 5.5.4 in experimental (but have not 
yet tested it):

rd@nanette:~$ rmadison plasma-desktop
debian:
 plasma-desktop | 4:4.4.5-7+squeeze1 | squeeze         | amd64, armel, i386, 
ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc                                            
 plasma-desktop | 4:4.8.4-6          | wheezy          | amd64, armel, armhf, 
i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, 
sparc                              
 plasma-desktop | 4:4.11.13-2        | jessie-kfreebsd | kfreebsd-amd64, 
kfreebsd-i386                                                                                                          
 plasma-desktop | 4:4.11.13-2        | jessie          | amd64, arm64, armel, 
armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x                                                                
 plasma-desktop | 4:5.4.3-1          | stretch         | source, amd64, arm64, 
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x                                                        
 plasma-desktop | 4:5.4.3-1          | sid             | source, amd64, arm64, 
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x                                              
 plasma-desktop | 4:5.5.4-1          | experimental    | source, amd64                                                                                                                          
new:                                                                                                                                                                                            
rd@nanette:~$  

Rainer

Am Dienstag, 29. März 2016, 00:32:00 schrieb Hillel Lubman:
> Hi.
> 
> Do you have any plans to package recently released KDE Plasma 5.6 in Debian?
> And what is the delay in general (5.5.x was skipped altogether). It it some
> compatibility issue or something else, or may there are some Qt blockers?
> 
> Thanks,
> Hillel Lubman.


Reply to: