[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Critical programs fail to launch



On Tuesday 19 January 2016 00:17:30 Carlos Kosloff wrote:
> Senior Lisandro,
> Thanks for answer, this is the output of the command, please let me know
> how to fix, apparently loopback is not running:
> 
> ckosloff@crosshair:~$ /sbin/ifconfig
> eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500
>          inet 192.168.1.204  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
>          inet6 fe80::3285:a9ff:fe8c:fbd4  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>
>          inet6 2602:306:ce37:61a0:3285:a9ff:fe8c:fbd4  prefixlen 64
> scopeid 0x0<global>
>          ether 30:85:a9:8c:fb:d4  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
>          RX packets 246475  bytes 148702029 (141.8 MiB)
>          RX errors 0  dropped 2  overruns 0  frame 0
>          TX packets 206981  bytes 26419500 (25.1 MiB)
>          TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
>          device interrupt 27  memory 0xfe400000-fe420000
> 
> I don't see any 'lo'.
> 
> However, /etc/network/interfaces seems to be OK:
> 
> # This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
> # and how to activate them. For more information, see interfaces(5).
> 
> source /etc/network/interfaces.d/*
> 
> # The loopback network interface
> auto lo
> iface lo inet loopback
> 
> # The primary network interface
> allow-hotplug eth0
> iface eth0 inet dhcp

Do you have network-manager running? As far as I know it shouldn't be 
conflicting with stuff in /etc/network/interfaces, but maybe the problem comes 
from there.

If you can't find the answer there allow me to suggest you to ask in a more 
generic debian mailing list or on irc on #debian.


Kinds regards, Lisandro.

-- 
firmaware: soft cuya licencia pagas enviando un autografo
  StucKman en #grulic, irc.freenode.net

Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: