Am Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2015, 21:04:56 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer: > On Thursday 02 July 2015 22:30:03 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > On Thursday 02 July 2015 12:49:05 Christian Hilberg wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > currently testing akonadi-server 1.13.0-3 (with the mysql backend, > > > that's the only one I use) from Debian/Sid on Debian/Jessie. > > > > thank you for testing. > > +1 > > Now I need to remember to make a stable update once it gets into testing > and then a blog post about it :-/ I now also tested this version for a few days and today did a akonadictl fsck It didn't create a lost+found directory. In the beginning I had 51 files in file_db_data, now I have 49, so it has not grown. But I also use SizeTreshold=32768 so that Akonadi will only cache mails with payloads larger there. I am now switching back to self-compiled Akonadi 1.13 branch as the one in Debian is just to slow for my huge setup. It seems to lack the MySQL performance work added later to the Akonadi 1.13 branch. KMail needs much longer to finish loading folder contents at startup and KMail and Akonadi also seem to easily loose connection to one another, so I restart KMail several times a day. So if someone who continues to use 1.13.0-3, probably with a smaller setup than mine, can try akonadictl fsck after some time and also check whether all is running nicely, that would be good. But my bet is that the patch it now includes is okay. I had no issues with it, except for the general slowness of Debian packaged Akonadi 1.13 compared to 1.13 branch from Git. Ciao, -- Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.