[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [wheezy] Icon Editor For KDE ?



On Sunday 14 Jun 2015 11:43:37 Alex DEKKER wrote:

> Allow me to row back somewhat:
> 
> $ locate kde4/apps | grep icons | grep svg | wc -l
> 134
> $ locate kde4/apps | grep icons | grep png | wc -l
> 1090
> 
> Looking through /usr/share/kde4/apps/*/icons it seems that, er, perhaps
> PNG is the dominant icon format after all. 

Ah - good research.  I wonder whether this may have anything to do with the 
lack of a special-purpose SVG-oriented icon editor.  
At one SVG icon-set page I found :
http://svgicons.sourceforge.net/
the author comments 
  "All icons in BlueSphere theme are designed using 
  SVG format. I have used Sodipodi vector-drawing 
  program, and partially hand-crafted (!!!!!) SVG (XML) 
  files using KWrite" - (my exclamation marks).

An interesting article here:
http://www.svgopen.org/2008/papers/104-SVG_in_KDE/
contains the disturbing remark:

  "The loss of quality in vector graphics at small size 
  is a severe problem. Rendering vector graphics 
  primitives at low resolutions introduces a certain 
  amount of blur into the output. This is mainly 
  caused by horizontal and vertical primitives which 
  happen to fall between pixel boundaries, which 
  in turn makes the anti-aliasing algorithms try to 
  cope with it by rasterizing two, instead of one 
  rows/columns but at a lower color intensity. For 
  primitives which are rendered at small sizes the 
  goals of "resolution independence" and 
  "preserving their good looks across resolutions" 
  diverges a lot. We have the former, we need the 
  latter."

which makes me think the use of SVG in this context is a little embryonic.

[As an aside, I'm faintly horrified to find this standard 128px x 128px SVG icon
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Oxygen480-status-dialog-information.svg
occupies a file size of 120Kb ! .... looking at the source recalls the old joke 
"XML is like violence - if it doesn't work, use more"]

Not that bitmap-style icon technology seems any better provisioned with 
dedicated utilities.  I note that the standard Gnome bitmap icon editor 
utility also seems dead in the water: 
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1161899
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/icon-editor-for-
ubuntu-4175490127/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/iconedit/
  "As of 2015-02-16, this project is no longer 
   under active development"

It's *weird* ..... back in the days of [gulp] Windows 3.1, it seemed that 
almost everyone tried their hand at writing an icon-editor utility, and there 
were many freeware and shareware tools (of varying quality) available.  On 
those cover diskettes that came with magazines there was almost always an icon 
editor or two ..... I wonder what changed people's minds.

On the upside, this means I can add yet another basic missing platform tool to 
my list of KDE applications to work upon when I've achieved basic competency.

Cheers
Nick
-- 
If Linux was a car, there'd be 18 steering wheels and no air conditioning,
but you'd be able to change the radio station from the hubcaps.


Reply to: