Re: What happened to rekonq?
Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 20:09:48 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> On Sunday 19 January 2014 19:13:39 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 16:06:26 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:30:56 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:25:51 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > > > I build my own version of rekonq and 2.4.0 is the most stable
> > > > > version
> > > > > I
> > > > > every had. I just copied to debian dir for building, i.e. I did not
> > > > > really
> > > > > put work into it.
> > > >
> > > > I forgot the link, if somebody wants to make us of it:
> > > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq_2.4.0-1_i386.deb
> > > >
> > > > (I know it is a very minor contribution, compared to what some of you
> > > > do).
> > >
> > > I build the new upstream release:
> > >
> > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/rekonq_2.4.2-1_i386.deb
> > >
> > > Note, this does not address the unmaintained qtwebkit issue discussed
> > > before.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Please share your source package as well. I want to build it for 64-Bit.
> >
> > Aside from that with copyleft licenses its always good to upload the
> > sources as well.
>
> I just rebuilt with the debian dir from the last Debian rekonq package the
> upstream sources.
>
> For completeness I uploaded everything to
>
> http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/2.4.2
Thanks.
You can find a 64-bit build against current Debian Sid with KDE SC 4.11.5 at:
http://martin-steigerwald.de/tmp/debian/rekonq-2.4.2/
rekonq starts and is able to show above URL and KDE homepage. Otherwise
completely untested. Didn´t even adapt the changelog.
Use at own risk. No complaints to Debian Qt/KDE team regarding this package.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Reply to: