Re: What happened to rekonq?
On Sunday 19 January 2014 19:13:39 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 19. Januar 2014, 16:06:26 schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
> > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:30:56 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 22:25:51 Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > > > I build my own version of rekonq and 2.4.0 is the most stable version
> > > > I
> > > > every had. I just copied to debian dir for building, i.e. I did not
> > > > really
> > > > put work into it.
> > >
> > > I forgot the link, if somebody wants to make us of it:
> > > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq_2.4.0-1_i386.deb
> > >
> > > (I know it is a very minor contribution, compared to what some of you
> > > do).
> >
> > I build the new upstream release:
> >
> > http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/rekonq_2.4.2-1_i386.deb
> >
> > Note, this does not address the unmaintained qtwebkit issue discussed
> > before.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Please share your source package as well. I want to build it for 64-Bit.
>
> Aside from that with copyleft licenses its always good to upload the sources
> as well.
I just rebuilt with the debian dir from the last Debian rekonq package the
upstream sources.
For completeness I uploaded everything to
http://bokomoko.de/~rd/rekonq/2.4.2
Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
http://bokomoko.de/
Reply to: