Re: Deebian 7.0 needs to support MTP (for Android), else it will lose relevance
The problem is that you take exactly the same position, _demanding_ KDE
4.10 in wheezy just because _you_ consider MTP support a must-have.
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:09:42 +0600
Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:55:14AM +0300, Pavel Mihaduk wrote:
> > Andrey,
> >
> > Have you ever tried to read what other people wrote? There's a
> > package freeze policy
> Have *you* tried to read what other people wrote and notice *who*
> writes *what*?
>
> > which defines the procedures quite clearly; besides,
> > Qt-KDE team is not that big and it's hardly possible they'll manage
> > to package and push KDE 4.10 till wheezy release.
> I know.
> I just don't like when people write silly and/or wrong things on
> matters they do not understand.
> And while "we are frozen and you may wait for a backport" is a valid
> argument, "I didn't see such devices so I think you are wrong" or "I
> am not convinced that MTP as a protocol is useful" are not.
>
>
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:33:35 +0600
> > Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:46:24PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Debian 7.0 (upcoming "Wheezy") needs MTP support in it's
> > > > > > > KDE in order to be relevant.
> > > > > > Honestly: I don´t care.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I understand the sense behind MTP in not having to *mount* a
> > > > > > device. But from what I have seen regarding MTP I am not
> > > > > > very convinced about it.
> > > > >
> > > > > How is this opinion relevant here? It's the only option.
> > > >
> > > > Aha.
> > > >
> > > > Even if you state your oppinion as a matter fact here, it is
> > > > still just an oppinion. Cause you didn´t state and prove any
> > > > facts in this thread so far.
> > > >
> > > > So how is your oppinion relevant here?
> > > >
> > > > I tried to explain you something. I got the impression you
> > > > didn´t even listen.
> > > >
> > > > I do not see a reason to waste another second of my life on
> > > > this.
> > > >
> > > > Thread set to ignore.
> > > Typical.
> > >
> >
> >
>
Reply to: