On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:55:14AM +0300, Pavel Mihaduk wrote: > Andrey, > > Have you ever tried to read what other people wrote? There's a package > freeze policy Have *you* tried to read what other people wrote and notice *who* writes *what*? > which defines the procedures quite clearly; besides, > Qt-KDE team is not that big and it's hardly possible they'll manage to > package and push KDE 4.10 till wheezy release. I know. I just don't like when people write silly and/or wrong things on matters they do not understand. And while "we are frozen and you may wait for a backport" is a valid argument, "I didn't see such devices so I think you are wrong" or "I am not convinced that MTP as a protocol is useful" are not. > On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 00:33:35 +0600 > Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 06:46:24PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > > > Debian 7.0 (upcoming "Wheezy") needs MTP support in it's KDE > > > > > > in order to be relevant. > > > > > Honestly: I don´t care. > > > > > > > > > > I understand the sense behind MTP in not having to *mount* a > > > > > device. But from what I have seen regarding MTP I am not very > > > > > convinced about it. > > > > > > > > How is this opinion relevant here? It's the only option. > > > > > > Aha. > > > > > > Even if you state your oppinion as a matter fact here, it is still > > > just an oppinion. Cause you didn´t state and prove any facts in > > > this thread so far. > > > > > > So how is your oppinion relevant here? > > > > > > I tried to explain you something. I got the impression you didn´t > > > even listen. > > > > > > I do not see a reason to waste another second of my life on this. > > > > > > Thread set to ignore. > > Typical. > > > > -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature