Hi Rainer! On Sat 01 Dec 2012 11:00:05 Rainer Dorsch escribió: [snip] > Do you agree, that it would make sense to have 2.6.0 in wheezy and that the > risk is to break something is very low (given the amount of testing 2.6.0 > saw in sid)? Well, as Modestas wrote: On Sat 01 Dec 2012 09:50:06 Modestas Vainius escribió: > > just wondering: does it make sense to ship wheezy with amarok 2.6beta1, > > while 2.6.0 is since many weeks in sid? > > Wheezy does not have 2.6 Beta 1, but it has a post 2.6 Beta 1 snapshot. > However, the diff between that pre-2.6.0 snapshot and 2.6.0 is huge and I > doubt it can get through freeze. [snip] > So wheezy is stuck with some unofficial snapshot which does not seem to be > so bad though as far as lacko of bug reports tell. So: > If yes, why not just send an unblock request on debian-release? With the > explanation that stable should ship with a released version, not a "in > between" version. I could open a bug report for that if that helps. No. Big changes like Amarok upstream did are not liked by the Release Team (which is totally correct). It's sad, but that's how things work. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- 6 - ¿Cuál es el botón del mouse que permite acceder a las acciones más comunes de archivos? a- El derecho b- El izquierdo c- El central ... ¿PORQUÉ no puedo ver la cara de un usuario de Macintosh?, ¿EH? Guillermo Marraco http://mx.grulic.org.ar/lurker/message/20080307.112156.460149a2.es.html Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.