Re: Status of the kdepim package?
Am Montag, 26. November 2012 schrieb Julian:
> On 25/11/12 12:00, David Smith wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 2012 12:51 AM, "Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer"
> > <perezmeyer <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>@
> > <mailto:email@example.com>gmail.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>>
> > wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 upstream
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > the bug you reported is a KDE bug. Please report it via
> > > Help -> Report bug... menu item of the respective application
> > > or by visiting https <https://bugs.kde.org/>://
> > <https://bugs.kde.org/>bugs.kde.org <https://bugs.kde.org/>/
> > <https://bugs.kde.org/> and following instructions
> > > to report a new bug.
> > Hello, I've tried forwarding a bug related to kmail in Debian Wheezy
> > to upstream using this method and it was rejected because upstream
> > said this version of kmail is no longer maintained. Do you know if
> > upstream might have made a mistake here or are kmail bugs in Wheezy
> > really unforwardable to upstream? ...or perhaps the above method of
> > reporting the bug for KDE upstream is putting the wrong version?
> > My bug report about a crash in Wheezy's kmail is here:
> > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309532
> > My debian bug report is here:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692275
> > upstream closes this bug as unmaintained and won't look at it. The
> > bts tracker then marks it as fixed upstream. Which I think might
> > cause any kmail bugs, including rather important ones, to fall off
> > the radar.
> > Thanks for your time.
> Hi, I'm not an official maintainer of the debian packages or
> kdepim/akonadi libraries and applications with dependencies on such.
> I will say this. I'm a big fan of KDE. Since KDE4 I've been using
> Not sure of the status of the kdepim debian package, still appears to
> be stuck at
> 4.4.x on all suites.
> Perhaps someone official would like to comment?
Please look in the mailing list archives.
Last official status was, thats its KDEPIM 4.4.x for Wheezy. Debian Qt/KDE
developers also shared their reasoning for this decision.
I am not aware of any official released KDEPIM 2 packages for Debian in any
suite, not even in http://qt-kde.debian.net
I think for stable it at least would need to be KDEPIM from KDE SC 4.9.3
as thats there first version search and filters seem to work nicely (most of
the time). Possibly even 4.10 to catch further improvements to Nepomuk and
how Akonadi accesses it.
And then this would need to be tested for quite a while.
While I´d really appreciate testing packages for KDEPIM 2 I understand
that they add additionally work for maintaining them in parallel. I
remember some mentioning of new packages with KDE SC 4.10 and intent to
skip 4.9 due to man power reasons here on this list.
So please consult archives. AFAIR its all there.
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7