Re: KDE PIM packaging
Am Donnerstag, 23. August 2012 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez
Meyer:
> On Thu 23 Aug 2012 04:50:14 Torsten Grote escribió:
> [snip]
>
> > Ok who do I have to bribe to get 4.8 or 4.9 KDE PIM packages? How
> > much do you want? ;)
> >
> > Is there anything that could be done to help with that? Is the summer
> > to blame?
>
> We currently lack the manpower to do this. We still have some RC bugs
> that need fixing, so we have some other stuff to do before thinking in
> kdepim.
>
> By the way, I don't know why you should blame the summer, I'm in the
> middle of winter ;)
Well I understand that RC bugs go first ;).
As for KDEPIM 2 packaging: It seems to be good to use at least KDEPIM from
KDE SC 4.8.6 or 4.9.1:
---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
Subject: Re: [kdepim-users] KMail2 at kdepim 4.9.0
Date: Samstag, 25. August 2012
From: Andras Mantia <amantia@kde.org>
To: kdepim-users@kde.org
Andras Mantia wrote:
> The only serious (ie. that could cause data loss) bug is with online
> imap
> accounts and local spam filtering. That is still not fixed, unfortunately
> the fix I tried didn't work. In that case you have two choices:
> - use a disconnected imap account (that just means mail bodies are
> completely downloaded)
> - do not use client-side spam filtering, but use sieve scripts server
> side
This one hopefully is fixed in 4.9.1, 4.8.6, 4.10.
Andras
_______________________________________________
KDE PIM users mailing list
Subscription management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-
users
-------------------------------------------------------
There have been some reports there that with KDEPIM 4.9 things finally
start to look quite good.
Ciao,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Reply to: