Re: Re: bug 675151: kmail vs akonadi?
Hi, thanks for this.
I am however not sure how exactly this thread relates except for talking about
the same object? As far as I can tell the problem I am observing is due to
Kmail being still the 1.13.x series in Debian.
Or are pointing me to:
> Enable "job tracking" in akonadiconsole
in https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2012-August/003017.html ?
On Friday 10 Aug 2012, Diederik de Haas wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2012 12:19:50 Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > As far as I can tell
> >
> > Akonadi::ContactSearchJob *job = new Akonadi::ContactSearchJob();
> > job->setQuery( Akonadi::ContactSearchJob::Email, email ); job->exec();
> >
> > always comes back empty regardless of whether there's such an e-mail in
> > the contact database or not.
>
> You may want to look over the akonadi mail archive @
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
> And then especially August and the thread that 'starts' with
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/2012-August/003003.html
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martinralbrecht.wordpress.com/
_jab: martinralbrecht@jabber.ccc.de
Reply to: