Re: Options for kdepim using kde 4.7/unstable?
On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
>> On 2012-03-15, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote:
>> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
>> >> On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius <modax@debian.org> wrote:
>> >> > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
>> >> > if you value your data.
>> >>
>> >> I officially disagree.
>> >
>> > Hmmm. I never did test it.
>>
>> on my laptop which runs kde master I have been using it since may.
>
> And your experience is good I read out of your "I officially disagree".
>
> You didn?t have any mail loss issues? That the thing I am the most
> concerned about - as this ThinkPad T520 with Intel SSD 320 should level
as far as I_know, I haven't lost any mails :)
There has of course from time to time been temporary glitches when you
use master branch, but still all in all it has been a quite ok
experience.
> What Akonadi backend do you use? Some time ago I switched from SQLite3
> that I used before to PostgreSQL as I read some MySQL related InnoDB
> configuration issue with sudden abruption of write operations due to power
> loss or kernel crash. For KAddressBook which already uses Akonadi in
> KDEPIM 4.4.5 this works nicely. I once had to delete some PostgreSQL lock
> to have the database started again after some crash - I reported this on
> bugs.kde.org -, but aside from that its fine.
I wouldn't use the sqlite backend, given it is slow and ineffective.
I used mysql because it was the thing that works out of the box.
/Sune
Reply to: