Am Freitag 07 Mai 2010 schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: > On Friday 07 May 2010 05:42:55 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: > > > On Thursday 06 May 2010 04:59:35 Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: > > > > > Heck, just stop kmail from migrating. Korganizer and > > > > > KAddressBook have required Akonadi since 4.2 or earlier. > > > > > > > > Again, AFAIK, kmail does not use Akonadi in KDE 4.4. > > > > > > Have you installed and tried it? I have. It does require Akonadi > > > in KDE 4.4.3. > > > > Again, no. KAddressBook does. And KMail uses KAddressBook for address > > completion. > > KMail did not hang during address completion. I composed a reply > without having keyboard focus enter any of the address fields. Once I > hit the "[Send]" button, the UI froze for both the composer and the > main (Kontact) window. > > Closing either stalled and then KWin asked if I wanted to forcefully > terminate the application. After doing so, I restarted contact from a > shell in order to watch the various messages printed. > > Kontact started normally and my message was in my drafts folder. I > opened the message from there and clicked "[Send]". Again, the UI > froze in both the composer and the main windows. On the console, > about once every .5 sec. or so, an error message was printing > indicating that the application could not connect to the local Akonadi > server (or maybe it was that Akonadi couldn't connect to the local > DB). > > In either case, KMail 4.4.3 will not send mail unless I have Akonadi > and MySQL installed. I do not have KAddressBook or KOrganizer > installed, since even the versions from testing have a indirect > Depends relationship on MySQL. Hmmm, strange. Well maybe KMail does address completion more directly than via KAddressBook. There might be a component in KDEPIM libs doing that for KMail. For - just for looking up email address - KMail really calls into Akonadi. But AFAIK it doesn't use Akonadi - through what ways ever - for anything other than retrieving contact data. Thus the use of Akonadi could not be that wide-spread in KMail. However, KDEPIM will use Akonadi more and more, so IMHO its better to have Akonadi improved and fixed than to remove the Akonadi dependency in KMail temporarily. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.