Am Donnerstag 06 Mai 2010 schrieb Kevin Krammer: > On Thursday, 2010-05-06, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > On 2010-05-05, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss@iguanasuicide.net> wrote: > > > I also have a history with MySQL and I *do* *not* *trust* it with > > > my data. = UPS or not. > > > > Then luckily you don't have to. The only data that mysql is *storing* > > (as opposed to caching) is data it still haven't been able to sync > > with the world. > > Additionally, I think it is possible to configure this version of > Akonadi to work with a Postgres instance. To me from my current impression of unreliability whether Akonadi is available or not this seems to put another experiment on a stack of experiments. Sorry, but from my findings I believe that Akonadi is not yet ready for prime time. As file indexing via Nepomuk. I reported most issues upstream and I can only suggest for other Debian users to do so as well. I don't think that Debian KDE developers have much time to deal with upstream bugs. Granted some of the bugs could also be packaging bugs, but I will ping back to Debian KDE developers should I get hints at that. Just sometimes I am fed up enough that I do not report a bug. Cause doing a proper bug report takes quite some time. I think I never reported that many KDE bugs than since KDE 4. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.