Re: EOL of KDE SC 4.4.2 in qt-kde.debian.net
On Saturday 10 April 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On šeštadienis 10 Balandis 2010 19:12:33 Michael Schuerig wrote:
> > $ apt-cache policy kdebase
> >
> > kdebase:
> > Installed: 5:58~rc4
> > Candidate: 5:58
> >
> > Version table:
> > 5:58 0
> >
> > 101 http://debian.netcologne.de experimental/main Packages
> >
> > *** 5:58~rc4 0
> >
> > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
> >
> > 5:55 0
> >
> > 990 http://debian.netcologne.de unstable/main Packages
>
> This clearly shows that dist-upgrade should pick up newer kdebase
> (see Candidate version).
It should, alas, it doesn't. See below. I can go through possible
solutions until there aren't any more, but KDE packages never show up.
Does this work for others?
Michael
$ sudo aptitude dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Reading extended state information... Done
Initializing package states... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
odbcinst1debian2{ab}
The following packages will be upgraded:
libruby1.8{b} libruby1.8-dbg odbcinst ri1.8 ruby1.8{b} ruby1.8-dev
6 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 6.072kB of archives. After unpacking 1.573kB will be used.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
ruby1.8: Conflicts: irb1.8 but 1.8.7.249-2 is installed.
Conflicts: rdoc1.8 but 1.8.7.249-2 is installed.
odbcinst1debian2: Conflicts: odbcinst1debian1 but 2.2.11-21 is
installed.
libruby1.8: Conflicts: libdbm-ruby1.8 but 1.8.7.249-2 is installed.
Conflicts: libgdbm-ruby1.8 but 1.8.7.249-2 is installed.
Conflicts: libreadline-ruby1.8 but 1.8.7.249-2 is
installed.
The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
Remove the following packages:
1) apt-listbugs
2) irb1.8
3) libdbm-ruby1.8
4) libgdbm-ruby1.8
5) libgettext-ruby-util
6) libgettext-ruby1.8
7) libreadline-ruby1.8
8) odbcinst1debian1
9) rdoc1.8
Tier: Safe actions, Remove packages (10000)
Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
--
Michael Schuerig
mailto:michael@schuerig.de
http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
Reply to: