Re: What is the plan to get KDE 4.2 into sid?

[David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com>]

On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:31:34AM +0000, David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > > On 2009-02-24, David Goodenough <david.goodenough@btconnect.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 24 February 2009, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 06:13:15PM +0000, David Goodenough wrote:
> > > >> > I have seen a few questions about this last week, most of which
> > > >> > were answered by saying that it was in the NEW queue.  But I had a
> > > >> > look at the NEW queue just now and there does not seem to be any
> > > >> > of KDE sitting in the queue.
> > > >>
> > > >> I guess you mean the answers to where went some pieces of kde 4.2
> > > >> went when it was uploaded to experimental. That is old stuff now :)
> > > >>
> > > >> About KDE 4.2 in unstable, we are actively working on it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ana
> > > >
> > > > No, I knew that 4.2 was in experimental, it was the move to sid that
> > > > I was looking to know about.  Are we talking days, weeks or months?
> > >
> > > Probably days or weeks, probably not months.
> > >
> > > The release team wants coordinated breakage of debian/unstable, so we
> > > are basically waiting for our ticket in the queue.
> > >
> > > /Sune
> >
> > Is there a wiki page or somesuch which describes this breakage plan?  It
> > would be a useful resource to us all.
>
> We will announce in advance (1-2 days) the important stuff (exaclty when
> KDE 4 will be the default desktop in unstable).
>
> If we have any resource we think it can be interesting for users, it would
> be linked in our website.
>
> Ana

I think you misunderstood whose page I thought this might be.  I was looking
for a release team general page, not a KDE specific page.  I was unaware 
that there was any breakage plan, and I was interested to know if it is a
public plan.  I realise this is not a really KDE question, but as you are
obviously in receipt of it, you must know where it came from.

David