KDE 3.5 backport

[Manfred Paul <manfred.paul@gmail.com>]

Hi,

mea from debian-desktop finish backporting KDE 3.5 to etch (ppc) and sarge (x86). But the sarge packages still have some bugs. 
The qt libs are named libqt3-mt in sid and etch, while they are names libqt3c102-mt in sarge.

That`s why my question. Should the qt package be renamed, or is it possible to add an provides statement into the control file? 

Here is an example:

Package: libqt3-mt
Version: 3:3.3.5-1mea1
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
Depends: libaudio2, libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-21), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.3.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.1.5-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.4.1-3), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libjpeg62, libmng1 (>= 1.0.3-1), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8rel), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxcursor1 (>> 1.1.2), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxft2 (>> 2.1.1), libxi6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxinerama1, libxrandr2 | xlibs (>> 4.3.0), libxrender1, libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), fontconfig
Suggests: libqt3-mt-psql, libqt3-mt-mysql, libqt3-mt-odbc
Conflicts: libqui1-emb, libqt3c-mt
Replaces: qt3-tools (<< 2:3.0.2-20020306-1), libqt3-helper, libqt3
Provides: libqt3c102-mt

Is this ok? Of course it can`t, because a can`t install these packages :-(

Is anybody confirm with backporting?

thx

manne

-- 
         (__) 
         (oo) 
   /------\/ 
  / |    ||   
 *  /\---/\ 
    ~~   ~~   
...."Have you mooed today?"...