Re: c++ allocator transition status
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Neither is the case with kaffeine in mind. It's not a lib, dependencies
> are not too tight, and it's already recompiled for c2a in Sid and could be
> pushed to testing with the rest of whatever when that's due.
> And I seriously hope they do not remove packages because of one
> unconfirmed bug with status grave (#336306).
Did you read the bug report (http://bugs.debian.org/328738)? It seems to me
serious enough not to label it as "unconfirmed". Why the bug was not
closed, or why the upload did not happen is another question, which needs
to be answered.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
Less is more or less more.
-- Y_Plentyn on #LinuxGER
(from fortunes -- I cannot resist :-)
Reply to: