Re: kmail corrupts emails [solved]
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 18:31, Nick Leverton wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 06:26:29PM +0200, Rigo Wenning wrote:
>> > Thanks a lot, will do too,
>> >
>> > but it remains that I need allies in convincing KMail developers to use
>> > their index only for caching and not for valid information.
>
> He? MBox is just the text of all messages concatenated together. Are you
> sure that other MUAs store the message status in there? Unless I'm
> mistaken, the mbox format doesn't support this.
It could be stored as an X- header in the message - but kmail can hardly be
blamed if somebody else uses a completely non-standard way to mark status.
--
derek
Reply to: