Re: kmail corrupts emails [solved]
Randy Kramer wrote:
> I suppose maildir will be OK (and maybe even better) for my inbox, which I
> generally keep "trimmed" (not too many emails).
>
> I don't think I want to do that for my mail folders which often have a lot
> (thousands) of archived emails (usually short).
>
> Is it the general consensus that mbox is more subject to corruption than
> maildir?
By definition.
Why do you think Maildir would perform worse for folders with thousands of
emails? Everything I've read suggests it will perform better - and more
reliably.
--
derek
Reply to: