On Sunday 04 April 2004 11:39, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Saturday 03 April 2004 21:21, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > On Saturday 03 April 2004 20:20, Jeff Coppock wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 18:44:41 +0200 > > > Hendrik Sattler <ubq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote: > > > > Am Saturday 03 April 2004 12:00 schrieb Mauro Darida: > > > > > I was a fan of kmail but left it for mutt since it does not work > > > > > well with procmail > > > <snip> > > > Just outta curiosity, what do you need from Procmail that the Kmail > > > fitering can't provide? > > > > for starters, case insensitive match, if you need it. For other more > > advanced things see 'man procmailrc' and 'man procmailex'. > Use regular expression in KMail. I tested it now with Kmail from KDE 3.2.1, because my last experiments are some versions older. So with both regular expressions and normal pattern-matching I get case-insensitive results by default. I see no chance to change this behaviour to case-sensitive. In the kmail-handbook is also a note that the search string of rewriting headers is allways case-sensitive. And again no chance to change it, if you need it. > > Last but not least is procmail one example of the well known unix > > philosophy. IIRC 'One (excellent) tool for one job'. Because of that, k3b > > uses cdrecord/cdrdao instead of implementing own burning code. > And because of it k3b is always slightly wrong and acts wierdly. In reality > k3b uses cdr-tools because there currently are no good libraries for > burning. A lib is a tool, too. Regards Georg Sauthoff
Attachment:
pgpeVI6UnXWnc.pgp
Description: signature