On Saturday 03 April 2004 21:36, Georg Sauthoff wrote: > On Saturday 03 April 2004 18:44, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > > Hi, > > > Am Saturday 03 April 2004 12:00 schrieb Mauro Darida: > > > I was a fan of kmail but left it for mutt since it does not work well > > > with procmail (it requires to make additional copies of mail > > > directories to work with procmail, which is simply nonsense to me). > > > Just wondering if in kde 3.2 the situation has changed. I am using a > > > backport kde 3.1.2 on woody. > > > Alternatively, is there another qt based mua which fully supports > > > procmail and both maildir/mailbox format? > > > > How do expect this to work? You then must make proper use of file locking > > and I doubt that using mbox would work at all in this case (two programs > > writing to the same file at the same time!). > > hm, kmail could implement file locking mechanisms like mutt or other mua do > it. I think this is the intention of the above question. There is a "procmail lockfile" option in KMail when adding a local mailbox (Network->receiving) Cheers, Kevin
Attachment:
pgpVpzVCO8fQ9.pgp
Description: signature