[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: does kmail in kde 3.2 fully support procmail?



On Saturday 03 April 2004 21:36, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2004 18:44, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Am Saturday 03 April 2004 12:00 schrieb Mauro Darida:
> > > I was a fan of kmail but left it for mutt since it does not work well
> > > with procmail (it requires to make additional copies of mail
> > > directories to work with procmail, which is simply nonsense to me).
> > > Just wondering if in kde 3.2 the situation has changed. I am using a
> > > backport kde 3.1.2 on woody.
> > > Alternatively, is there another qt based mua which fully supports
> > > procmail and both maildir/mailbox format?
> >
> > How do expect this to work? You then must make proper use of file locking
> > and I doubt that using mbox would work at all in this case (two programs
> > writing to the same file at the same time!).
>
> hm, kmail could implement file locking mechanisms like mutt or other mua do
> it. I think this is the intention of the above question.

There is a "procmail lockfile" option in KMail when adding a local mailbox 
(Network->receiving)

Cheers,
Kevin

Attachment: pgpVWxUy2siHI.pgp
Description: signature


Reply to: