Re: [FAQ] Passwordless logins don't work in KDM 3.2
Hmm,
Note I said 'from KDM's point of view', not from the system's point of view :p
David
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:36, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 18:34, David Pye wrote:
> > It does work?
> >
> > Hmm, if so, then it matters little to me which one is used.
> >
> > If I might ask, what's the difference, from KDM's point of view, as the
> > user isn't prompted for a password in either scenario, effectively making
> > either one a passwordless login...
>
> There's a rather huge difference: the graphical shell is still unlocked
> without a password, but people can't just use that account and login e.g.
> via ssh without a password.
>
> Huuge difference.
>
> Jan
>
> - --
> A new chef from India was fired a week after starting the job. He
> kept favoring curry.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFAT1IjUQQOfidJUwQRAld0AJ4udHp0mgfVkSfyMOIoFk3Re8BcdwCfdw4/
> iY7bNZXik8Cxlgzx6kH/oA0=
> =W13i
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: