[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE 3.1.4 repository and Libranet 2.8.1



That's what I feared, so I stayed away. However, I thought that maybe those
binaries were no different than the ones the eventually find their way in
sarge and sid, and if that was the case, I'd try them out.

Antiphon wrote:

> You cannot use those packages since Libranet 2.8.x is based from sarge.
> The kde.org repository is only for woody machines.
> 
> Unless you want to downgrade most of your core apps to woody, I would
> advise against doing it.
> 
> On Thursday 06 November 2003 04:46 pm, Ralph Alvy wrote:
>> I notice this repository, posted over at kde.org:
>>
>> http://download.kde.org/stable/3.1.4/Debian stable main
>>
>> Is there a problem with me just adding that to my default sources.lst.
>> Other than having extra repositories for xfce4, my current sources.lst is
>> the way it came with Libranet 2.8.1.
>>
>> The reason I ask about the above KDE repository is that I see that, even
>> with the recent addition of KDE 3.1.4 packages to Sarge, some KDE
>> packages there are still not 3.1.4.
>>
>> For non-Libranet users, the Libranet default sources.lst looks like this:
>>
>> #Libranet
>> deb http://libranetlinux.com/ updates/2.8/
>> deb http://libranetlinux.com/ security/2.8/
>>
>> #Debian
>> deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free
>> # deb-src ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/ sarge main contrib non-free
>>
>> #Debian Non-US
>> deb http://non-us.debian.org/ sarge/non-US main contrib non-free
>> # deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/ sarge/non-US main contrib non-free
>>
>> #Debian security updates
>> deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ sarge/updates main contrib
>> non-free
>> deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main
>> contrib non-free
>> # deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ sarge/updates main
>> contrib non-free
>> # deb-src ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security/ stable/updates main
>> contrib non-free
> 
> 




Reply to: