Re: Kmail problems with signed attachments
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:29AM +0200, Mika Fischer wrote:
> Hi, David!
>
> On Thursday 10 April 2003 01:29, David Pye wrote:
> > I [resume you're aware the ^M characters are actually DOS/Windows
> > carriage returns? ie CRLF, rather than the unix convention of just
> > LF..
>
> Yes, I know :)
>
> I just can't think of a reason why kmail would put them in there (only
> in the signed part) then sign the message and then remov them again
> befor sending the mail out :)
> It just doesn't make any sense...
Because that's the way the RFC says you have to... I've made a simple
"signing bot" using Python/Pyme for some tasks inside my LUG, and I were
utterly failing for a couple of hours until I re-read carefully the RFC
and saw that reference to CRLF.
Reply to: