On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 02:23:07PM +0200, Frank Van Damme wrote: > On Wednesday 09 April 2003 13:26, Daniel Stone wrote: > > Well, I'm talking Australian dollars. There was a reason why I still had > > the PII when I *maintained* KDE. > > Ugh... Must be painful to compile c++ code on such a box. gcc2.95 was a lot better, but still, incredibly painful. > > OOo is ridiculous in so many ways, including a 15min startup time on > > lower-end machines. It's the worst benchmark of anything you could > > possibly pick. > > Yes... bad design, bloat, redundant code, all the horrors in one... We use it > at home because of the good support for MS office formats though. *nod*. KOffice does a pretty good job of imports these days, however. > > Did you report a bug? :) > > IIRC, the data was confidential. Oh, fair enough then. I actually haven't seen KGV screw up yet, which is a fair achievement. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@raging.dropbear.id.au> <dstone@kde.org> KDE: Konquering a desktop near you - http://www.kde.org
Attachment:
pgpiYrIzDL_w6.pgp
Description: PGP signature