Re: [ftpmaster@debian.org: kdenetwork_3.1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 08:48, Chris Cheney wrote:
> I will try to upload fixed debs for kdenetwork and kdepim once I get a
> computer again...
>
> Of course this minor bug is too heinous to allow the packages to go in when
> they fix many more important bugs.
Chris,
can you fix this in CVS at least so I can finish off my debs for woody which
will go on ftp.kde.org for the release ?
Thanks,
Ralf
>
> Chris
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Randall Donald <ftpmaster@debian.org> -----
>
> Envelope-to: ccheney@cheney.cx
> Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 00:27:54 -0600
> From: Randall Donald <ftpmaster@debian.org>
> To: Christopher L Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>
> X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.23 $
> Cc: Debian Installer <installer@ftp-master.debian.org>
> Subject: kdenetwork_3.1.1-1_i386.changes REJECTED
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
> tests=none
> version=2.50
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
>
>
> Copyright:
>
> kit, kmail, kmailcvt, knode, korn, kppp, kcmtalkd,
> ktalkdlg, lisa, libkdenetwork, mimelib
> --------------------------------------------------
> GPL
>
>
> kdict, ksirc
> ------------
> Artistic
>
>
> Sorry to be so pedantic, but you need to refer to the copy of the GPL
> and Artistic licenses in base-files.
>
>
> --
> Randall Donald
>
>
>
>
> ===
>
> If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
> override file requires editing, reply to this email.
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
- --
We're not a company, we just produce better code at less costs.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------
Ralf Nolden
nolden@kde.org
The K Desktop Environment The KDevelop Project
http://www.kde.org http://www.kdevelop.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+dtVzu0nKi+w1Ky8RAtKkAKCPJaDFqF8217hnPU2injXG+txD+QCguun6
oo0YH6vSKUELELF9ObTTPSc=
=ny0N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: