[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kdelibs4



Hi,

Johannes Rohr wrote:
> On Sam, Feb 08, 2003 at 05:41:34 +0100, Mika Fischer wrote:
> > * Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> [2003-02-08 17:25]:
> > > Why is the package not called "kdelibs4c102" ?
> > 
> > Because there never was a klelibs4 package using the g++ 2.95 ABI. 
> > 
> > The whole point of waiting until the transition starts before
> > uploading KDE was that this way we only need one version in sid an no
> > stupid c102 packages :)
> 
> Who chose this weird suffix anyway? Does it have a meaning? Will it go

Yes. The package is compiled with the 102 version of the C++ ABI.

> away again some time after the transition?

It can go away if the SONAME changes...

Regards,

Rene
-- 
 .''`.  Rene Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Attachment: pgpe7VVL1sejU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: