Re: Build times?
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 05:06:25AM +0100, Bjoern Krombholz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 10:53:42PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 05:12:49PM +0100, Bjoern Krombholz wrote:
>
> > i'm not impressed ... the debian build does everything four times, so
> > you're not even 2.5 times as fast. :-P
>
> Hmm? I'm not shure i got it right - 4 times? Why?
>
(static, dynamic) x (nothread, thread)
i didn't study the rules file in detail, but i think it needs to rebuild
the complete lib every time. ok, the factor 4 is seriously skewed by
executables (qmake, moc, designer, ...) being built only once - so
maybe it's only 3. 3.3 times as fast does not impress me, either. :)
> > > Compiling C++ stuff takes much longer than plain C because of the
> > > preprocessing
> > cpp does not not need much time,
>
> Never said anything else. ;)
>
of course. :)
> > a) g++ is slower than gcc
>
> Aren't those both the same, more or less?
> (`g++' equals `gcc -lstdc++ -lm')
>
look behind the curtain. ;)
hint: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/
greetings
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
Reply to: