Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
From: Karolina Lindqvist <pgd-karolinali@algonet.se>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 23:45:36 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200211162345.36914.pgd-karolinali@algonet.se>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021116210114.GD10818@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>
References: <[🔎] 200211161234.08879.tilleyrw@cfl.rr.com> <[🔎] 20021116210114.GD10818@trinity.unimelb.edu.au>

lördagen den 16 november 2002 22.01 skrev Daniel Stone:

> See http://www.debianplanet.org. The gcc-2.95 maintainer fucked
> libstdc++ up. Badly.

So lucky I am - I stopped updating to unstable level except for some 
application here and there. 

-- Karolina

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
  - From: Rob Weir <rweir@softhome.net>

References:
- Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
  - From: Robert Tilley <tilleyrw@cfl.rr.com>
- Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
  - From: Daniel Stone <dstone@kde.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Problems with upgrading a fresh woody installtion to kde3
Next by Date: RE: Problems with upgrading a fresh woody installtion to kde3
Previous by thread: Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
Next by thread: Re: Recent Reformat -- Was It Necessary?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread