[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GCC 3.2 migration



So Chris do you feel it'd be worth while to put a gcc 2.95 kde 3.0.4 in
unstable and then have kde 3.1 wait for gcc 3.2 or do you think the
change will happen sooner than we expect?

Todd


On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 15:04, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 01:35:09AM +0200, tomas pospisek wrote:
> > Btw. AFAIK (!!) the KDE project itself does _not_ want to target a
> > specific compiler. So in this regard it's Debian who's pushing the edge.
> > That means that obstacles, in addition to what the packaging in itself
> > brings, are likely to be encountered.
> > *t
> 
> Well most other distributions have already gone to gcc 3.2, glibc 2.3 (or
> 2.2.9x) but debian is having trouble due to them being broken on various
> platforms other than x86. glibc 2.3.1 was uploaded to debian earlier
> this week which aiui was required before the gcc transition can happen.
> I am not certain what it is actually waiting on now, the information on
> Willy's page is very out of date (afaict) it was last updated on Aug 16.
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 




Reply to: