Re: KDE debs building
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 September 2002 12:09 pm, Karolina Lindqvist wrote:
> måndagen den 16 september 2002 11.20 skrev David Pashley:
> > I'm sorry that just isn't true. KDE HEAD has been kept up to date as much
> > as possible. People have been able to build packages for 3.1 for the last
> > few months. I could check the dates if you are interested. We haven't
> > provided binary packages because a) they take up a lot of room and b)
> > calc has been busy making sure that 3.0.x is working, bab has been
> > working on koffice 1.2 and everyone else has been making sure that HEAD
> > works. We have never said that we will start for on 3.1 debs once 3.1 has
> > been released.
>
> Good you say it, since then I don't have to bother with building KDE 3.1
> packages for others. Actually I never intended to and just made my own
> packages available, and was surprised by the demand. I am happy for the
> feedback I got on this list, and will improve my own packages and packaging
> technique. I have some plans and make small experiements on improvements,
> based on problems I have heard on this list, from all kind of KDE versions.
>
If you want to provide patches, we will gladly look at them. Just send them to
the list.
> If someone want my new packages for KDE 3.1 beta 2, when they come, I will
> make them available. But as you say, it is probably not needed since you
> already have done the work and hopefully will also provide binary packages.
>
I can't provide binaries, but I'm sure someone will. Hopefully it will start
to get a bit less bumpy so when beta 2 is tagged, files won't be moved around
so much.
> -- Karolina
- --
David Pashley
david@davidpashley.com
Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9hcYaYsCKa6wDNXYRAhX0AJ4rOZfRD5CxuM7bkKitH0jBPwMuzwCdGse1
CoPDUxjK75TDfUfVpLWOEgM=
=Pw49
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: