[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Where is KwinTV? Again.

I think the story of KwinTV is documented here.  Myself?
I run quite happily for years - xawtv.  It runs beautifully
under KDE and any other window manager.  It's fast, accurate
and is continually being updated (w/o breakage) and is available
(woody, sid) by apt-get xawtv 
It's home page is http://bytesex.org/xawtv/index.html and the
author is a Debian developer.

I don't know why kde is moving forward with KwinTV ?... I'll try
it again like I have done in the past but I always go back to xawtv!

FWIW - I run asmix as my volume control (on the KDE desktop), 
I also use a neat tool called gvidm (on my KDE Toolbar) which lets
me easily change resolution (from my normal 1600x200 to 640x480)
for full screen TV.  Both those tools probably allow me to "love"


On Saturday 02 February 2002 at 10:20, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> Am Samstag, 2. Februar 2002 at 4:03 schrieb Chris Cheney:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 11:04:36PM +0000, John Gay wrote:
> > > I thought this was now an official part of kde multimedia? Who is
> > > building the multimedia packages or are you looking for a
> > > volunteer? After my initial,
> >
> > As far as I can tell it is still part of kdenonbeta, I will take a 
> > look at it after getting the rest of kde cleaned up and
> > if it works ok I will package it.
> Kwintv was long unmaintained. Development started again some time ago.
> Debs are at:
> deb http://arachni.kiwi.uni-hamburg.de/~harlekin/ ./binary-i386/
> They will go into main some time, but right now there are way to many
> segfaults on various systems. 
> Also xv support is missing (but worked  on)
> Thanks for the info! I'm fetching these to see how they work on my 
> system. Once I can get it working, I'll be happy.

> Chris:

>Thank you for your info as well. I am guessing that Max's deb's should 
> be replacable with yours, so it should be a simple matter of just 
> letting apt replace Max's debs with yours once they are uploaded.

> Cheers,
> John Gay

Reply to: