Re: assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2
From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@tdyc.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:43:26 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010305234326.B25438@tdyc.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 01030521481402.21971@huashan>; from doliver@hampshire.edu on Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 09:48:14PM -0600
References: <[🔎] 20010305211550.A8295@uinpluxe.npl.uiuc.edu> <[🔎] 01030522220800.10562@bill> <[🔎] 01030521481402.21971@huashan>

> Speaking of kalamaris.. is there a package for kalamaris in the works? 

not that I've heard.

-- 
----------------
Ivan E. Moore II
rkrusty@tdyc.com
http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD

Reply to:

References:
- assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2
  - From: Fred Gray <fegray@npl.uiuc.edu>
- Re: assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2
  - From: John Dalbec <jdalbec@cboss.com>
- Re: assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2
  - From: Dylan Oliver <doliver@hampshire.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: assertion failure with new KDE packages?
Next by Date: Re: Windows Shares
Previous by thread: Re: assertion problem "solved": use non-GL qt2.2
Next by thread: Mirroring kde.debian.net
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread