[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: kdestudio and kde-designer



El Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 04:52:07AM -0700, Ivan E. Moore II dijo:
-| > I refreshed my kdestudio installation today but I keep getting the same error:
-| > 
-| > studio: error in loading shared libraries: libkdefakes.so.0: cannot open shared
-| > object file: No such file or directory
-| > 
-| 
-| what version of kdestudio is it?  I'm *pretty* sure I built the latest
-| version myself.

Package: kdestudio
Version: 2.0.0-0.potato1
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Maintainer: Mariusz Przygodzki <dune@home.pl>
Depends: kdelibs3 (>= 4:2.1-beta2-0), kdelibs3 (>= 4:2.1-beta2-0) | kdelibs3-crypto (>= 4:2.1-beta2-0), libc6 (>= 2.1.2), libjpeg62, libpng2, libqt2.2 (>= 2:2.2.3-0.potato8) | libqt2.2-gl (>= 2:2.2.3-0.potato8), libstdc++2.10, libtiff3g, libz1, xlib6g (>= 3.3.6-4), kdebase-libs
Suggests: kdbg





-| 
-| 
-| > A  side from this, before I updated to 2.1-final I was using kde-designer with kdevelop (I understand this is qt-designer with kde support isn't it? ) 
-| > When I upgraded to 2.1-final kde-designer was removed I now I can only have qt-designer.
-| > Why is this?
-| 
-| probably because of versions...I *just* uploaded kde-designer 2.3.0-beta1. The
-| current version that's in unstable is 2.2.4.  I have to build qt first, the
-| kdelibs, then kde-designer...so kde-designer gets bumped to the bottome of the
-| list and I sometimes forget about it. :)
-| 
-| Ivan
-| 
-| -- 
-| ----------------
-| Ivan E. Moore II
-| rkrusty@tdyc.com
-| http://snowcrash.tdyc.com
-| GPG KeyID=90BCE0DD
-| GPG Fingerprint=F2FC 69FD 0DA0 4FB8 225E 27B6 7645 8141 90BC E0DD
-| 
-| 
-| --  
-| To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
-| with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
-| 

-- 
______________________________
Daniel de los Reyes
S2-Selling Soluciones
Valencia Spain
e-mail: dadecal@s2-selling.com
Powered by Debian GNU-Linux 2.2r2
______________________________



Reply to: