Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility]
>
> On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in
> > > the
> > > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a
> > > regression
> > > [1] introduced in upstream release 11.0.9+11, which is present in
> > > buster via a security upload [2]. This keeps Debian on par with
> > > other vendors - e.g. RedHat [3], Ubuntu [4], and AdoptOpenJDK [5]
> > > -
> > > and introduces the same upstream version currently available in
> > > testing and unstable.
> >
> > The versioning here appears to cause issues in at least Jenkins -
> > see
> > https://issues.jenkins.io/projects/JENKINS/issues/JENKINS-64212
>
> Have there been any further issues that people are aware of?
>
> The Jenkins fix is not yet available to most users if I understand
> correctly, so we need to consider the tradeoffs between the
> regression on the OpenJDK side and requiring manual intervention on
> Jenkins installations (and possibly other things confused by the
> version string).
To tie up a couple of IRC conversations with Moritz, the fixed Jenkins
versions have now been released, so we can probably just tell people
they need to upgrade.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: