[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libbatik-java: Changed artifacts?



Am 09.09.2017 um 20:22 schrieb Christopher Hoskin:
>>
>> One suggestion: If you update a library, it would be good to test
>> whether any r-dep fails to build. There are not many for the case of
>> batik.
>>
> 
> Is there an automated way to rebuild all of the reverse dependencies
> of a package and see a summary of the outcome? libbatik-java has 25
> immediate reverse dependencies which would take a while. It would be
> good to leave it running in the background whilst I do something else.
> 
> (Yes I could write a script, but as developers must be updating
> libraries all the time, I suspect a well-polished one should already
> exist.)
> 
> Christopher

There is for instance ratt [1] or debomatic [2].

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt
[2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/debomatic

We probably should collect all this information including your AWS
mass-rebuild setup at wiki.debian.org. I'll give it a try soon.

Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: