On Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:55:42 -0700, tony mancill escribió: > > [...] > > My question for the list is just how "sloppy" experimental can be during > this transition? For example, I could go ahead and upload jnr-posix, > which will break the build-r-deps that aren't yet patched, but may also > others to get started on transitioning r-deps and eventually allow us to > transition more quickly. At some point we'll break things temporarily > anyway, since jnr-posix, jnr-ffi, jnr-constants (and jffi?) all need to > hit the archive at the same time to allow building of their refactored > r-deps. I think we can allow experimental to be "sloppy" in order to accomplish the transitions more quickly. It is also the only way to upload new things to the archive in this deep deep freeze stage in the release cycle. > > Any thoughts on materializing these new versions as uploads to > experimental while we get everything in place? In the practice, I think we are already proceeding that way, isn't? BTW, thanks for sponsoring jnr-* packages! -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature