[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please don't fork javahelper



Hello Thomas,

Thank you for the welcome message and your wishes for this project. I hope this contribution can be of great benefit to the Debian and non-Debian community. I also want to salute the java packaging team and hope we get to work together.

As Paul mentioned earlier, we've talked about this and there will be no forking. I apologize for not updating the project description (that's done now). My wish is to reuse javahelper as much as possible and build on top of it. I hope we can work together on building and improving these tools.

I'm eugecm on #debian-clojure if you need to contact me, I'm there 24/7 and you can also contact me via email.

Cheers,
Eugenio



On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Wolodja Wentland <debian@babilen5.org> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 13:03 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 06:24:25PM +0200, Thomas Koch wrote:

> > So your plan to fork javahelper and to create just another packaging tool
> > terrified me. Are you really sure that you need to fork javahelper and that you
> > can not extend javahelper for your needs?
>
> Terrified is a bit strong.
>
> There won't be code copies if we can prevent it (it'd have to be really
> unexpected at this point) and extend / wrap the existing tool where we can't.

I agree wholeheartedly with this. It might make sense to clarify this in the
GSoC project description lest other people also be misled.
--
Wolodja <debian@babilen5.org>

4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA  36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC

_______________________________________________
Pkg-clojure-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-clojure-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
https://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-clojure-maintainers



Reply to: