Re: Java Policy [Was: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch]
* Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> [2008-10-28 11:34]:
> On Tue Oct 28 11:15, Andrew Overholt wrote:
> > * Matthew Johnson <mjj29@debian.org> [2008-10-28 11:15]:
> > > I'm also still convinced we need to mandate the use of Class-Path:
> > > entries in manifests to avoid transitions in rdeps when you update
> > > your dependencies.
> >
> > This goes against the Fedora and JPackage guidelines, FWIW.
> >
> Yes, and I don't understand
Have you spoken with them? jpackage-discuss@zarb.org would probably get
you a response. The Fedora policy inherited that bit from Nicholas
and/or Ville et al at JPackage.
Andrew
Reply to: