[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Confused about the Glassfish packages



On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Tue Sep 09 13:48, David Goodenough wrote:
> > Well not really.  If all they are intended to be is a source of JARs for
> > development purposes than thats fine (but it would be useful to be told).
>
> It's a bug that you aren't told (-:
>
> I'd say either there's a wishlist or normal bug about the description
> and documentation, or there's an important, severe or grave bug about
>
> the functionality. In either case there's a bug though (-:

Yes but which to submit.  Lets sort that out then I will add a bug (unless
someone beats me to it).

David

> > For this reason I thought that a discussion on the list was the best
> > starting point.
>
> That's still reasonable. Sadly I can't answer the original question
> though (-:
>
> Matt



Reply to: