On Wed Jan 30 14:20, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > Hi, > > Michael Koch said: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:32:46AM +0100, Eric Lavarde - Debian wrote: > >> - the Java Policy should state that a Java package should depend on > >> java2-runtime only if the packager expects its program to work with a > >> classpath-alike implementation of Java. > >> (what about IcedTea then?) > > > > IMO all java packages should depend on java2-runtime as second > > alternative and bugs should be filed against runtimes not working > > properly with a package. > Oookay... Looks like we're doing circles here. How do we progress now? > I'm fine with both options, but I feel that we need a consensus within > debian-java, and that we don't have it yet. I think we should hammer out a new set of virtual packages (I think Michael is planning on sending an email on that subject) so that we have a situation which better fits both the points of view, and then update the policy to match that. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature