Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)

To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
From: "Arnaud Vandyck" <avandyck@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 13:56:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] a330e9100707020456n2fd0ed4br9e089a78bba74266@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] f68cg0$4mf$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <a330e9100704120554g2a0d3c07vbe14ae8a8d253bb1@mail.gmail.com> <evlbte$k56$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] a330e9100707010153g15d345bdp8b70cc34ec72fe46@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] f68cg0$4mf$1@sea.gmane.org>

On 7/1/07, Marcus Better <marcus@better.se> wrote:

Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> The RC bug has been closed, but moving argouml, libgef-java and
> arbortext-catalog to xerces2 should be done. And then, remove xerces1.

Care to file some bugs? :)


OK, I'll do that asap ;-)

--
Arnaud Vandyck

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
  - From: "Arnaud Vandyck" <avandyck@gmail.com>

References:
- Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
  - From: "Arnaud Vandyck" <avandyck@gmail.com>
- Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
  - From: Marcus Better <marcus@better.se>

Prev by Date: Re: Java buildd service
Next by Date: Re: Java buildd service
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Should we remove xerces-j (libxerces-java 1.4.4)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread