[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

FOP and BATIK removed from testing



Hi,

I'm not sure I really sure I properly understand the consequences of those
annoucements, but I'm sure I appreciate that fop & batik are part of
Debian.

Any risk that it won't be the case in the future? Anything I can do to
avoid this?

Thanks, Eric

-- 
Eric de France, d'Allemagne et de Navarre
--- Begin Message ---
FYI: The status of the fop source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:0.20.5-8
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060915; done 20060916
    Bug #385293: batik: build-depends on libgnujaxp-java, which is RC-buggy

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
FYI: The status of the batik source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1.6-2
  Current version:  (not in testing)
  Hint: <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/vorlon>
    # 20060915; done 20060916
    Bug #385293: batik: build-depends on libgnujaxp-java, which is RC-buggy

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.

_______________________________________________
pkg-java-maintainers mailing list
pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers



--- End Message ---

Reply to: